Yesterday they cancel/shorten afterschool programs, for the storm, it dumps even more when they get home, the roads are in worse shape than that certain monday morning, yet... no delay, no closing... nuttin. STRANGE... spooky and weird...
so this early thing saved my butt - i got to leave a bit early - ride home in the break (while the roads were still wet, not snow covered) and wait at the bus stop for 20 miuntes...
here's the blue beast, who's drive train made Kerry homesick. Okay - she didn't say 'homesick' but used nostalgic... minor point.

There it is - i didn't realize i got a picture of the Brown Track team (a guess based on a few ratty sweatshirts and the age of the guys and their fitness level).... well a pic of the last guy trying to catch up to the group....
Right now the bikes sittin here dripping on the long strip of bubble wrap... the water/salt/dirt/brake dust being sucked up by strategically placed paper towels... No i don't lock it up outside, inside or where ever... it comes in and keeps me company here at work.
That nice crusty salt film has turned to a dingy dirty film... but i don't know if i want to embarass the bike any more by photographing it in such a state...
I hope A. doesn't mind but when I posed the power question and the efficiency between grinders and spinners he said something that biologically makes a fair bit of sense... even to a Botanist (me).
There's so much to a question like this, ranging from mitochondrial density to cellular receptors that scavenge cholesterol particles. In general, the higher cadence wins the day on a balance sheet (looking at ATP generated and enzymes, etc...) but the body has such a high degree of plasticity that it will compensate to produce high torque more efficiently. Think ullrich
That said, we're talking about between 75-110 rpm, not down to 40 or so, which is where some grinders are at. Even ulli is pretty high when he's at his most diesel. within the confines of what would be ideal, the higher cadence takes my vote because the less myosin heads needed to produce stability the less overall ATP used per stroke and somewhere in the ether the math works out to show that: for lance you spin more and use less atp for myosin=#ATP used < spins="#ATP"
he made the comment too that for many people 75 rpms IS spinning... point taken... and it probably wasn't the best low number to use... and i have to say, anytime i hear spinning, i get flashbacks to married student housing at MSU doing cadence intervals on the rollers in the living room... Listening to either Rush or Led Zepplin. Generally i found Rush to be the best roller music... at least for me... the songs are just long enough to get a good interval in, and one works really well for holding 130 for a while and then the music and psyco nature in me always goes for the 150 rpm... anyone who says you can't spin 180mm cranks... well must have either short legs or just never tried it... And cadence- for the record -was measured using a Vetta C-20... I liked that cycle-computer... now i've got a Sigma something or other... no cadence (well i have the cadence hook up but its too bulky for the Klein and the Dura-Ace crank combo).
anyway... thanks to A... and in part the thought process... i got wondering if maybe i would be better off going with a trendy fixed gear, something with a lower ratio than what i've got kickin on the P-mount (big blue beast)... just stuff to wonder about i guess... and keep wondering till i have a frame i wanna make fixie...
I'll shut up for now, by sayin, i do envy Kerry's trip out to the southwest... but i like it here, gimme some nice 14 mile climbs around here somewhere and i'll be completely cycling satisfied (hills mind you that can be ridden to, not driven to)



















