Time to move on. I feel somewhat turned around. Not to take away anything i wrote - it is pretty damn unadulterated. That said it could be worse. Did yall read what JP has been going through? That's solidly sad and messed up. Maybe, this is a temporary down turn. Having a poor race ain't the end of the world. I ain't getting paid for this. Heck the winner of our race only got $25 out of the deal. $25 for winning an open Masters race (technically it was a $50 bill, but then with an entry fee of ~$25, day off or almost that via bikereg, it is what it is). It isn't about the points (Masters are masters, categories are meaningless essentially, you are fast if you train or are genetically gifted). It is about racing.
Bad days, good days. They come and go. Learn and move on. Learn from both. Make a correction in the course and look towards the future. Like steering a ship, you can hold a steady course by watching the wake, but if you aren't looking ahead you'll crash and sink... it takes more skill to look a head and steer a straight course, more work. But it has to be done.
So the decreased attendance lately is bothering people. Why decreasing? Just the cold?
Could it be the increasing number of races on the calendar for a given day? Or is it the races down in the MidAtlantic pulling riders? Races around the country pulling people away from our region? We have a strong region but maybe many of the throngs travel to the biggest races in the country. Leaving the smaller races feeling the pinch of lower participants?
Maybe it is the changing race day schedule. Early season there were individual categories for most races. Now. It seems the promoters are sticking the earliest starts to the two largest fields. Cat 4 and C 3/4+. Ala Sterling and Farmington. Then when you add a third field (and not the smallest of fields either) the 55+ to the mix. And then ask the 55+ to go for a championship while trying to ride through both the 3/4+ and the 4 racers i dunno. That's a tough call for a 9am group.
Sterling has 128 racers pregistered for the 9am race, 31 for the 10am race, 57 at 11, 60 at 12, and then the last two UCI races don't count so much as they are elite/UCI men and women races.
Does that seem disproportionate? Rightfully so or not. It is odd. The 11am race should be considered an elite event as it is the 1/2/3 Masters race. the 12 is the 2/3 race...
For many of the 9am participants they can come, race, and go home and have a full day doing other stuff: watching the Patriots dismantle another team or playing with the kids or raking leaves or what ever. But, that is the big core of your spectators right there. They go, sure and then there is parking for the elites in prime locations. But no spectators for them.
Then there is the whole notion of starting the Cat 4 before the Cat 3/4+ and then making the 55+ start last. Pretty crazy. If it was me, i'd do it backwards. But then, maybe they have done it backwards and maybe it doesn't work doing it that way. I dunno. Why not put the lowest (traditional) turnout earliest?
Are the races i talk about the least the ones w/o any attendees? Or is the fact that i'm talking about something the reason other people are showing up?
There are two races this weekend. I'm only considering doing one of them. Baystate obviously. Yes i had a crappy day on the bike. But my wife said i looked good out there. Meaning, i've stopped looking bad on the bike when racing. That's a good start right? A good day at work is still a good day and it does rank higher than a bad day on the bike. But yes, you can't have good days without bad days or the good days cease to be good. I do seem to have better days when the 3/4+ race is its own race. Those races i can start aggressively and attack and hold on. The 1/2/3+ races i haven't been as aggressive in the start and it seems to someties translate into the rest of the race. Lowell's start wasn't sub par due to lack of aggression, it was due to the fact that my freaking left foot (ground foot) slipped and i botched the start. Had to play catch up. The affect maybe of the start wasn't during the race but afterwards. I'd not raced in knee warmers. Not sure what prompted me to start racing in them yesterday. But then, maybe if i'd kicked ass wearing them i'd have been glad i did. Experiment and learn. Right?
I've really only got 4 races left in the season. If you count Baystate up in Sterling. 4 left. 2 of those are at Goddard park here in RI. Baystate, MRC, verge finale. GCD is right though. If i don't race Sterling, i'll be worse off mentally than if i did. It would be a replay of Canton all over again i think. But then, if i had been racing at Canton maybe i wouldn't have dug as deep in Dayville to pull out a 4th place there. Who knows. Look forward. And yes, rethinking and rethinking is what i do too much. Too much thinking. Not enough turning the brain off and going as hard as i can towards the objective...
Okay - there - way too much introspection for one day... way too much...
During a visit to the mental asylum, a visitor asked the Director
how do you determine whether or not a patient should be institutionalized.
'Well,' said the Director, 'we fill up a bathtub, then we offer a
teaspoon, a teacup and a bucket to the patient and ask him or her
to empty the bathtub.'
'Oh, I understand,' said the visitor. 'A normal person would use the
bucket because it's bigger than the spoon or the teacup.'
'No.' said the Director, 'A normal person would pull the plug. Do
you want a bed near the window?' (thanks for the joke Lee)
-g

13 comments:
I do seem to have better days when the 3/4+ race is its own race. Those races i can start aggressively and attack and hold on. The 1/2/3+ races i haven't been as aggressive in the start and it seems to someties translate into the rest of the race.
Dude. You do better in the 3/4 race because it's a goddamn 3/4 race. You can't be as aggressive in a 1/2/3 race because people are just fuckin faster. I get my ass whooped in 1/2/3 and it's got nothing to do with aggression and everything to do with fitness.
As for people being concerned about turnouts, it's basically just solo saying "hey no one was at UNH," which has a very good explanation and has nothing to do with the general state of new england cross.
no - i speak not to results...
but how i approach attack the race
yeah, but what's the feedback you get to decide on how successful your approach was? The results and your competitors around you. It's easy to ride the front 3rd of a 3/4 race and be "aggressive" and "attacking."
Ride at that same speed in a 1/2/3 race and you'll be in the bottom 3rd and be too busy trying to claw your way back to wheels to be "aggressive."
Does this mean you actually rode worse in the 1/2/3 race? Not necessarily, but it will sure feel that way, right?
Maybe his lycra shorts were squeezing his junk and f'ing up his mojo.
what - i need to be sporting some wool instead?
Sure - i guess... but if i was gonna drop that much coin all at once (discount on Ibex or not) i'd be buyin a new bike...
not wool shorts...
no, just baggies. You must be behind in your blog reading...
At least you're not fat. If you didn't have that facial hair, you'd almost look like a bike racer. At least trim it down like Boonen or something, you f'ing tree bark munching bike commuter hippie
nah - i caught the baggie reference..
just playing up like you were being consistent...
if Adam Myerspace forbids commenting in one's own web log then i wonder what he things about cross commenting with little referencing... or should we ask cyclorazzi
as weird as it seems for a non-conformist to make rules like that, it would be worse if you followed them
Non-conformist? It all just part of his uniform of indivuality.
Willi works smack dab in the middle of thousands of kids tring to be different like everybody else.
wait - a non-conformist on the UCI committee?
oh crap...
what is next?
ORBA joining the UCI? declaring that Oregon is not part of the union and thus needs a special country designation and representation at all world cup and UCI events?
so long as at least a few don't turn into their parents, there is hope. I think it's sometimes called evolution.
dude, just a bad race. I had a bad race at Putney. I had a bad race at Canton. Dont turn into a head case like me.
Plus, I was psyched with my race and you sucked the joy out of me. Joy sucker.
J
Ride at that same speed in a 1/2/3 race and you'll be in the bottom 3rd and be too busy trying to claw your way back to wheels to be "aggressive."
Does this mean you actually rode worse in the 1/2/3 race? Not necessarily, but it will sure feel that way, right?
I agree with Colin (sorry). I looked at my [lack luster] results from Canton, where I finished 3rd from last. Had I done the 3/4 race instead, with the time I put up (we did the same number of laps), I would have won. It's a different level of hurt, and you really can't compare the two.
I still think you did great. You had a lot of guys behind you, and you looked strong. As I tell our team, focus on the positive, learn from the experience, and move on.
Post a Comment